Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141217
Uptime	17 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '17 at 15:55
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 186 62% 111 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 636 60% 499 Pts	64-Core 979 61% 979 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Palit(1569 13C0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.5% Below average	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 47.7 Parallax 67.8 31% 51 fps	MRender 49.2 Gravity 59.3 Splatting 38.2 39% 48.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe 1,224 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	75.5% Very good	Read 704 Write 352 Mixed 401 107% 486 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 14 66% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 70.5 DQ Mixed 50.3 61% 111 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 58GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 128 128 25789202728 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2556 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11448 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1601 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 8017 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 8017 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 150324576285 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	89.7% Excellent	Read 156 Write 157 Mixed 156 118% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.17 77% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 8x4GB 308 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 44.8 MC Write 42.5 MC Mixed 40.9 122% 42.7 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 17 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 139%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $154Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $941

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16