Asus P5Q3 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q3 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090526
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 17:29
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5492 69 User benchmarks, average bench 53% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 84.5 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 94.7 50% 75.8 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 138 22% 157 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6970 9,594 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 03BC) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Lighting 35.3 Reflection 25.3 Parallax 28.6 29% 29.7 fps	MRender 22.1 Gravity 27.1 Splatting 31.1 22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9545443 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -85005992718533 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1662 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 324 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 50 47247917089 (C2) HDA temperature 33 50 47247917089 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9545443 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9545443 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9545443 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6483 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5008 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5008 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5788 (F4) Unknown 98 98 4522048	42% Average	Read 193 Write 112 Mixed 148 33% 151 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 13.1 86% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 91.1 DQ Mixed 10.4 22% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 698GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 123 123 12897091769 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2828 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3433 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1424 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2829 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2829 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 219043987491 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	83% Excellent	Read 146 Write 144 Mixed 98.4 96% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.17 71% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 234GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 186 184 1691 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12503 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17952 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6886 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 669 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 114 114 260511 (C2) HDA temperature 115 74 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 22 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	33.3% Below average	Read 57.1 Write 58.5 Mixed 27.1 35% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.19 67% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 41%
WD WD2000JB-00GVA0 200GB 597 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 42GB free Firmware: 20.00K20 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 192 0 (03) Spinup time 186 0 5691 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3966 (05) Reallocated sector count 154 154 364 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8065 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2938 (C2) HDA temperature 118 97 32 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	33% Below average	Read 56.4 Write 58.4 Mixed 50.2 41% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.41 97% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.1% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 7.5 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q3 DELUXE Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q3 DELUXE

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	20x
Xeon X5470IntelBench 54%, 1,638 samples	16x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	9x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	6x
T400NvidiaBench 18%, 717 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x

SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	28x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	22x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16