Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '17 at 13:29
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 50.1 2-Core 96.7 51% 77.9 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 278 29% 232 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 120 Parallax 103 83% 108 fps	MRender 97.9 Gravity 103 Splatting 101 82% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 1 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6878 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1554 (B1) Unknown 92 92 89 (B3) Unknown 99 99 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 49 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 96 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20849039773	61% Good	Read 383 Write 254 Mixed 201 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 17.9 94% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 43.1 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 20.1 26% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 108%
Md300 120G 120GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 50GB free Firmware: 20151013 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 298 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 811 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 101 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 20 (A4) Unknown 100 100 20024 (A5) Unknown 100 100 28 (A6) Unknown 100 100 6 (A7) Unknown 100 100 19 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 48 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 35 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 46026 (F2) Unknown 100 100 248207 (F5) Unknown 100 100 66172	40.9% Average	Read 329 Write 151 Mixed 165 47% 215 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 1.95 59% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 92.4 DQ Mixed 1.89 17% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2TB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 41 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 71 69 8793 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3367 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12262 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3382 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 47 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 51 210454118427 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 272 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 2 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3446	64.2% Good	Read 99.1 Write 124 Mixed 119 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.31 4K Mixed 0.41 124% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM 800 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.5% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 8.7 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	41x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	22x

GPU
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	7x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x

RAM
99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF Team--Elite-133300 8GBKingstonBench 26%, 4 samples	3x
M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG KRE-D3U1600M/8G000 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 18GBNanyaBench 27%, 6 samples	3x
DDR3 2000G DDR3 2000G Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF 12GBAdataBench 27%, 9 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16