| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Alienware Aurora-R4 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware 0FPV4P |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131126 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 20 '17 at 19:49 |
| Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.7%
Very good
|
78% 136 Pts
|
54% 439 Pts
|
34% 550 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 3633) 3GB
CLim: 1407 MHz, MLim: 1815 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.31
|
59.7%
Above average
|
60% 82.4 fps
|
59% 74.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
114% 152 MB/s
|
48% 0.45 MB/s
| |
|
USB Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
18% 17.2 MB/s
| |||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
95% 33.2 GB/s
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
62% 64.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,684 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware Aurora-R4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 577x |
| Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 451x |
| Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 232x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 123x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 92x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 91x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $262 |