Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160629
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '17 at 12:01
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 212 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 628 62% 504 Pts	64-Core 829 51% 829 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8412 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2388 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 48 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 127 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6408664873	112% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 416 Mixed 424 100% 452 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 46.8 164% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 118 145% 259 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 344GB free Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3350 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 183 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 93 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 43 244814118943 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2978120591 (F7) Unknown 100 100 93401590 (F8) Unknown 100 100 22466610 (B4) Unknown 0 0 3561 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	82.8% Excellent	Read 485 Write 341 Mixed 337 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 24.4 98% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 45.1 98% 204 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 104%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	301% Outstanding	Read 2,621 Write 1,863 Mixed 1,893 471% 2,126 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 63.7 213% 81.6 MB/s	DQ Read 424 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 165 176% 296 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 301% Great: 353%
Seagate Desktop HDD 5TB (2015)-$634 281 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: CC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 226352355 (03) Spinup time 89 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1844 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 17920073 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5758 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1375 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 51540394002 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 44 172337004576 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 2559 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 11705 (C2) HDA temperature 32 56 73014444064 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 41 226352355 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 41 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 71472550778192 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7122839970 (F2) Unknown 100 253 87864748543
Poor: 60% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 5,376 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.4% Good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 22.9 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 19.9 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	154x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	100x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	41x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	19x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x

RAM
CL15-15-15 D4-2133 2x8GBUnknownBench 68%, 1,169 samples	12x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 78%, 415 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 121% - Outstanding

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16