| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110223 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 25 '17 at 10:13 |
| Run Duration | 98 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.2%
Above average
|
60% 97.8 Pts
|
19% 142 Pts
|
9% 148 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.31
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
10% 12.2 fps
|
13% 15.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
54.1%
Above average
|
70% 93.4 MB/s
|
96% 0.79 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown U3A4G83-13G9HN2B00 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.7%
Poor
|
22% 7.6 GB/s
|
21% 7.23 GB/s
|
55% 72.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 22x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 16x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 9x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $197 |