| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| System | Packard Easynote TJ65 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Packard SJV50MV |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091025 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 25 '17 at 20:12 |
| Run Duration | 387 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.6%
Below average
|
36% 51.7 Pts
|
8% 60.2 Pts
|
4% 60.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0219) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1892
|
0.32%
Terrible
|
0% 0.38 fps
|
0% 0.34 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
32% 144 MB/s
|
47% 16.6 MB/s
|
32% 52.9 MB/s
|
|
|
7.15%
Terrible
|
15% 15.5 MB/s
|
19% 1.56 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Force 64GB
7GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.97%
Terrible
|
14% 12.4 MB/s
|
44% 1.08 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.4%
Very poor
|
12% 4.37 GB/s
|
12% 4.03 GB/s
|
36% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Easynote TJ65 Builds (Compare 45 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Packard Easynote TJ65
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium T4300IntelBench 34%, 6,462 samples | 10x |
| Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples | 7x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples | 28x |
| GeForce G210MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,370 samples | 9x |
| Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 37% - Below average | Total price: $54 |