Cube I15-TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCube I15-TC  (all builds)
MotherboardHampoo Cherry Trail CR
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '17 at 04:15
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Memory 11.1
1-Core 10.6
2-Core 20.8
8% 14.2 Pts
4-Core 35.2
8-Core 31.4
5% 33.3 Pts
64-Core 29.4
2% 29.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.34 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4064 63GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.4% Very poor
Read 144
Write 96.4
Mixed 111
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 8.26
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 4.12
24% 7.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 3.17
7% 14.2 MB/s
Generic APPSD SD Card 537GB
494GB free
Firmware: 0.0
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Read 2.54
Write 7.18
Mixed 3.75
3% 4.49 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.81
205% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 393
10% 393 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback