Gigabyte GA-PH67A-D3-B3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-PH67A-D3-B3 (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120321
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '17 at 12:36
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 57.9 2-Core 120 40% 89.1 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 471 42% 358 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 0.56 1% 1.45 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 1.96 2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK128MBF 128GB 465 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4557 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1807 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 187 (AE) Unknown 100 100 209 (B4) Unknown 0 0 863 (B7) Unknown 100 100 577 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 42 249109610534 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 4 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 94 94 6 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 7813508760 (F7) Unknown 100 100 261947147 (F8) Unknown 100 100 936904142	37.8% Below average	Read 230 Write 99.5 Mixed 114 32% 148 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 13.7 70% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 50.1 DQ Mixed 15.6 18% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 101%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	8.83% Terrible	Read 16.8 Write 12.5 Mixed 9.68 16% 13 MB/s	4K Read 5.24 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 0.57 66% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.83% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 7.3 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 1.8 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 652 6% 652 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-PH67A-D3-B3 Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-PH67A-D3-B3

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	26x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	17x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	6x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	34x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	19x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16