Alienware Aurora

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Aurora  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 04VWF2
Memory6.6 GB free of 9 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '15 at 22:14
Run Duration412 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 96.1
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 189
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 450
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5970 (Crossfire Disabled)
AMD(1002 2042) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 21.5
19% 19.2 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 16.2
12% 15 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.7% Above average
Read 262
Write 180
Mixed 183
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 16.8
80% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 61.9
74% 131 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MK4055GSX 400GB
220GB free
Firmware: FG011M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 47.9
Write 51.5
Mixed 37.6
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.22
65% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
98GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 85.6
Write 71.6
Mixed 80.3
60% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.43
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 112 8GB
7GB free, PID 162a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Read 19
Write 3.6
Mixed 6.67
10% 9.76 MB/s
4K Read 3.29
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.01
13% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 53.8
74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $249
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback