Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage Formula (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '17 at 16:19
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 45.8 2-Core 91.9 46% 70.8 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 182 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.7% Outstanding	Lighting 109 Reflection 154 Parallax 136 88% 133 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 140 Splatting 114 101% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5348 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1291 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 16 (AE) Unknown 100 100 141 (B4) Unknown 0 0 5575 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 56 188979675171 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 10759134628 (F7) Unknown 100 100 337422924 (F8) Unknown 100 100 4765145	54.4% Above average	Read 262 Write 170 Mixed 157 43% 197 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 19 94% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 26.5 47% 93.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 963GB free Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34387788195 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1229 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2318 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 603 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1229 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1229 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 167504904227 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	85.3% Excellent	Read 153 Write 144 Mixed 159 115% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.24 87% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 888GB free Firmware: 50.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 161 6558 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6149 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12308 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3141 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 448 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 146734 (C2) HDA temperature 114 108 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 32	48.4% Average	Read 91.1 Write 77.5 Mixed 82.6 63% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.21 77% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 885GB free Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 16 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4442 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 4329032779 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14391 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3004 (B7) Unknown 95 95 5 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 34360262765 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 59 605290532 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 376 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4903 (C2) HDA temperature 36 41 64424509476 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 21 9 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -82128364623420 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1527766565 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1920371111	39.6% Below average	Read 73.5 Write 62.7 Mixed 72.1 52% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 6.03 4K Mixed 0.43 178% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	36x
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	34x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $115Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	94x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	20x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16