| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150805 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 06 '17 at 22:29 |
| Run Duration | 231 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.5%
Above average
|
48% 73 Pts
|
23% 171 Pts
|
11% 183 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.1
|
25.2%
Poor
|
25% 32.6 fps
|
26% 31.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
66.6%
Good
|
78% 349 MB/s
|
94% 34.4 MB/s
|
27% 47.1 MB/s
|
|
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ100E5 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
65% 87.7 MB/s
|
100% 1 MB/s
| |
|
|
41.5%
Average
|
48% 64.3 MB/s
|
90% 0.71 MB/s
| |
|
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
24% 32.1 MB/s
|
107% 1.01 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion 1TB
78GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
30% 24 MB/s
|
24% 0.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
30.8%
Below average
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
18% 6.43 GB/s
|
50% 79.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |