Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2820h
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151026
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '17 at 17:29
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 71.8 1-Core 27.7 2-Core 55.3 36% 51.6 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 111 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B A001) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.11.4 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	7.51% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 11.1 Parallax 10.8 7% 10.2 fps	MRender 9.62 Gravity 7.37 Splatting 13 8% 10 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.51% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37 7,072 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1279 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5883 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 4672 (0A) Spinup retry count 217 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5803 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1201 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 1300 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 14315 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 249108758555 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 90 90 4327 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 256 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	49.6% Average	Read 79.5 Write 93.4 Mixed 31.1 50% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.2 72% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 38GB 3,056 User benchmarks, average bench 16% null MHz 1024, 1024, 36864 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.7 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 97.2 41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 21%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	24x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	9x
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
PX-128S3C 128GBPlextorBench 71%, 3,097 samples	2x
LCS-128M6S 128GBLiteonitBench 76%, 1,777 samples	2x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16