Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '17 at 14:22
Run Duration	382 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 81.9 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 762 73% 603 Pts	64-Core 970 60% 970 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 72.2 Parallax 63.5 58% 69 fps	MRender 75 Gravity 67.9 Splatting 72.4 59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3440 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 339 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 53 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 169 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4016914806	97.5% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 414 Mixed 416 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 37.4 137% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 92.8 102% 173 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 305GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 100 253 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 75 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 65 589234207 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 3 (C2) HDA temperature 112 108 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	79.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 146 Mixed 105 95% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.25 101% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 139GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 159 7366 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6374 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14973 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1639 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 225 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 344775 (C2) HDA temperature 117 106 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	34.8% Below average	Read 66.9 Write 54.6 Mixed 51.5 43% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.07 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 63%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 128GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 684 (03) Spinup time 144 138 3775 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1688 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 15116 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1681 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 295 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2039 (C2) HDA temperature 109 98 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.4% Good	Read 126 Write 109 Mixed 111 87% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.38 103% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 69%
WD My Passport 259F 3TB 1,516 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2.5TB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 93.2 Write 96.5 Mixed 85.3 118% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.23 70% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 49%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 278GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 62.3 Write 56.4 Mixed 59.5 76% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 0.64 4K Mixed 0.27 33% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB 3,542 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 193GB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 54.5 Write 91.5 Mixed 71.6 100% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 44%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 95GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 36.1 Mixed 34.2 46% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.12 49% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 43%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 128GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 91GB free, PID 0326 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 92.2 Write 38.5 Mixed 56 71% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 3.76 4K Mixed 2.9 270% 6.14 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 46%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 89GB free, PID 0740 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 59.5 Write 51.2 Mixed 69.5 78% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.09 51% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 41%
SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 128GB-$36 967 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 27GB free, PID 558b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 190 Write 54.7 Mixed 96.6 123% 114 MB/s	4K Read 6.91 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 1.15 152% 3.54 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 2x8GB 803 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 43.7 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 32.6 106% 37.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 41.1 SC Mixed 27.6 88% 31 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16