Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '17 at 22:05
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 72.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 245 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 978 87% 734 Pts	64-Core 1,349 84% 1,349 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% PNY(196E 097A) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 25% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 176GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 25049 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 907 (B1) Unknown 71 71 348 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 40 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 229 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18289876398
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 176GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 25050 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 900 (B1) Unknown 71 71 345 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 37 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 222 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18783551464
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19910 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 927 (B1) Unknown 95 95 93 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 56 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 146 (F1) Unknown 99 99 68931515834	103% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 416 Mixed 421 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 73 4K Mixed 43 157% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 87.7 94% 157 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 144 144 84 (03) Spinup time 147 147 21500723553 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3933 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 33 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 27878 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1058 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 4839 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 4839 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 227634380833 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	70.3% Very good	Read 120 Write 125 Mixed 128 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.2 87% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 88%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 392GB free Firmware: JP4OA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 84 84 6029568 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 102 (03) Spinup time 131 131 25790710017 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4887 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 49 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 130 130 35 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 30153 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1660 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6050 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6050 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 266288889887 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 50 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 828	44.5% Average	Read 74 Write 81.1 Mixed 72.3 57% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.29 72% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 30GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 224 163 3766 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6670 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 36177 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2175 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 781 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 129 129 215106 (C2) HDA temperature 121 84 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	34.4% Below average	Read 63.9 Write 55.8 Mixed 53.8 43% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.24 76% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GB 3,530 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.4% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 26.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 22.5 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	45x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	32x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	25x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	24x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	13x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	12x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	6x

RAM
Memory 4400 C19 Series 4x8GBPatriotBench 119%, 282 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $764

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16