Supermicro X9DA7/E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSupermicro X9DA7/E  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DA7/E
Memory115.1 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130802
Uptime44 Days
Run DateSep 26 '14 at 20:40
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 178
61% 134 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 749
62% 538 Pts
64-Core 2,264
140% 2,264 Pts
Poor: 61% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 73
43% 60.2 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 40.4
41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 973GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 903
Write 584
Mixed 726
164% 737 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 24.3
95% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 122
155% 276 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 116%
Great: 308%
AFT CF XM37U SS 32GB
17GB free, PID 6558
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.4% Average
Read 117
Write 85.4
Mixed 70.4
109% 91 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 1.67
153% 4.14 MB/s
Typical X9DA7/E Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DA7/E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $149
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback