Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results


Gaming 100% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X99 (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20151127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '16 at 17:09
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 95.7 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 201 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 846 75% 635 Pts	64-Core 1,117 69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Z (SLI Disabled) 571 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 1078) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 72 Parallax 82.6 143% 110 fps	MRender 84.6 Gravity 56 Splatting 55.3 52% 65.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 75%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-512V2S-11 2.5 7mm 512GB 356 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 384GB free Firmware: FC9110A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 669 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1868 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 63 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 150 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 636717 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1010044	90% Excellent	Read 525 Write 403 Mixed 452 102% 460 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 33.9 136% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 68.9 52% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 105%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 2,353 Write 1,458 Mixed 1,650 403% 1,820 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 32.7 184% 70.8 MB/s	DQ Read 48.9 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 32.2 44% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 283%
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 512GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 234GB free Firmware: EXT07D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 761 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 20 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 99 100 8770 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9228143241 (F2) Unknown 99 99 9617799860	92% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 409 Mixed 436 101% 454 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 20.1 117% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 18.3 82% 187 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 96%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 216 179 6183 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 824 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1468 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 211 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 184 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 850 (C2) HDA temperature 114 109 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	97.1% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 147 Mixed 144 120% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.21 102% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C15 4x4GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 50.5 MC Write 42.1 MC Mixed 40.8 127% 44.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 22.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 55.1 73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	353x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	157x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	107x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	39x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	33x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	30x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 120%, 113 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $625

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16