MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7693
Motherboard	MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693) (all builds)
Memory	22.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '17 at 22:27
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 5 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 68.8 1-Core 24.6 2-Core 50.2 34% 47.9 Pts	4-Core 98.5 8-Core 152 16% 125 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340 26,573 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Gigabyte(1458 22BC) CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.4 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37% Below average	Lighting 32.9 Reflection 39.8 Parallax 84.7 27% 52.5 fps	MRender 62.7 Gravity 61.9 Splatting 79.1 57% 67.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 447 Write 359 Mixed 379 88% 395 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 14.5 73% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 35.8 DQ Mixed 15.4 16% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 19.6 Mixed 22.9 29% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.21 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 1.3 143% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 800, 667, 800, 667 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 8.3 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	960x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	412x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	264x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	166x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	149x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	141x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	87x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	140x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	47x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16