HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160404
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '17 at 17:46
Run Duration	494 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 168 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 333 44% 332 Pts	64-Core 332 20% 332 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1494) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.16 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 95 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 75 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4295557127 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 49 47 227633266739 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 8590000130 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 30 (EA) Unknown 100 100 72 (F1) Unknown 253 253 55 (F2) Unknown 253 253 33 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	51% Above average	Read 499 Write 286 Mixed 252 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 5.21 40% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 84.6 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 4.95 15% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 86%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40 5,497 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 461GB free Firmware: K2AOA60A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 160 160 200 (03) Spinup time 121 121 30103372344 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 20 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 31 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 64840 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 20 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 56 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 56 (C2) HDA temperature 119 119 231929348142 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	35.3% Below average	Read 60.4 Write 61.9 Mixed 60.7 46% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.38 112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 34%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 29.4 Write 15.1 Mixed 19.1 25% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.32 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.51 102% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 38%
SMI USB disk 8GB 5,941 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Read 12.9 Write 4.33 Mixed 5.04 8% 7.41 MB/s	4K Read 2.57 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.005 10% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 10%
Innostor Innostor 16GB 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 15.6 Mixed 9.24 20% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.92 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.34 45% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GB 3,379 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 14.5 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 13.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	685x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	593x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16