Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H97M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '17 at 18:03
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	AND-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3450 1,246 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 87 1-Core 102 2-Core 198 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 161 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 4.04 Parallax 3.59 2% 3.33 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.26 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5056 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1635 (B1) Unknown 99 99 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 55 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 31 (EB) Unknown 99 99 27 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12351179143	105% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 409 Mixed 416 99% 447 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 43.6 163% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 96.3 105% 179 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 104GB free Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 50415201 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8515 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 97734071 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22514 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 37 3183 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065670 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 80 51 336789524 (C2) HDA temperature 20 49 30064771092 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 14 50415201 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 38568806349246 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2333686974 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2389164902	49.7% Average	Read 94.3 Write 78.7 Mixed 93.2 67% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.46 95% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	249x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	120x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	108x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	92x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	62x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	31x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	44x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16