Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '17 at 00:46
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 79.9 1-Core 119 2-Core 239 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 902 82% 686 Pts	64-Core 1,326 82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2506 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.4% Above average	Lighting 66.7 Reflection 76.9 Parallax 62.5 54% 68.7 fps	MRender 87 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 78.3 63% 77.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB 1,744 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 45GB free Firmware: DXM05H6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6789 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1336 (AA) Unknown 100 100 2288 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 88 88 425 (AE) Unknown 99 99 60 (B7) Unknown 99 99 47 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 58 31 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	92.2% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 370 Mixed 411 96% 434 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 88.3 4K Mixed 24.2 127% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 66.4 101% 191 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 100%
Goodram C40 120GB 873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6465 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1892 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 25 (AD) Unknown 100 100 312541369 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 64 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8875088	28.7% Poor	Read 174 Write 20.1 Mixed 72.9 19% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 3.01 62% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 80.3 DQ Write 81 DQ Mixed 1.65 23% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 193 188 53239 (03) Spinup time 169 159 6533 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3111 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 9 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13409 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2802 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 94340 (BC) Unknown 1 1 163235692543 (BE) vendor-specific 66 52 589430818 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 270 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2840 (C4) Reallocation count 191 191 9 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 65430 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 199 198 577 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 198 195 646	54.6% Above average	Read 91.1 Write 99 Mixed 95.6 72% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.16 72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 75GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 169 2200 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3571 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5440 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1599 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 270 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 154 154 138883 (C2) HDA temperature 110 95 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 98 98 1800 (F1) Unknown 200 200 50703571905 (F2) Unknown 200 200 79506444100	64.3% Good	Read 115 Write 109 Mixed 114 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.18 90% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 30.1 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 38 SC Mixed 26.7 84% 29.3 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)