Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 02 '18 at 16:48
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 48.2
2-Core 96.3
53% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 286
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 39.9
37% 43.4 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 36.8
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS500G32TND-3112A 500GB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30060P00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 493
Write 448
Mixed 392
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 31.9
116% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 82.3
83% 135 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra 120GB
70GB free
Firmware: 365A13F0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 196
Write 64.3
Mixed 76.5
24% 112 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 13
69% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 30
43% 79 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
548GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 162
Mixed 106
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.26
81% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
545GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 61
Write 71.2
Mixed 47.3
45% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.32
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38%
Great: 62%
Corsair Voyager GT 3.0 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 101
Write 9.52
Mixed 16.4
36% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.46
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.25
47% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 13.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback