Asus M4N98TD EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4N98TD EVO (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110414
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '18 at 19:40
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 54.3 2-Core 108 54% 83.2 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 218 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Lighting 76.8 Reflection 77.2 Parallax 67.6 63% 73.9 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 71.3 58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GB 2,125 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 119GB free Firmware: X3511006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 3029 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 480 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 128852951044 (AE) Unknown 100 100 74 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 52 116770078753 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 3337258533916 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	38.2% Below average	Read 181 Write 104 Mixed 47.9 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 13.5 75% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.7 DQ Write 89.5 DQ Mixed 7.35 20% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 87%
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$67 926 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 153 143 11333 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2276 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10864 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 588 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 328 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1947 (C2) HDA temperature 123 102 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	80.3% Excellent	Read 135 Write 145 Mixed 116 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.34 122% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.2% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 12.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.1 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4N98TD EVO Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4N98TD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	12x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	11x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
Radeon HD 5500AMDBench 3%, 5,613 samples	3x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
830 512GBSamsung $500Bench 73%, 1,815 samples	2x
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	14x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $311

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16