Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '18 at 22:58
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 222 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 443 59% 442 Pts	64-Core 446 28% 446 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E272) 2GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 36.7 Parallax 49.4 33% 42.3 fps	MRender 32.6 Gravity 34 Splatting 42.3 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 72GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 20081 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2507 (B1) Unknown 98 98 45 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 63 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 166 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2780079807	73.2% Very good	Read 509 Write 387 Mixed 425 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 16.4 70% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 96.4 DQ Mixed 63.6 78% 144 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 86%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0309 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24083 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3050 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 97 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 17527839656776 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 81 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 32 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	49.5% Average	Read 496 Write 191 Mixed 274 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 4.86 54% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 21.3 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 4.8 22% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 124GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 132 128 4391 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2497 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20213 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2497 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 156 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 120 120 242369 (C2) HDA temperature 112 102 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.3% Above average	Read 100 Write 88.7 Mixed 68.8 64% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.2 92% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 85%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 60GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 187 5533 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4258 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 5 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 19 19 59395 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4239 (BE) vendor-specific 34 17 66 (C2) HDA temperature 84 67 66 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7806 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	28.4% Poor	Read 48.2 Write 50.1 Mixed 22.7 30% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 108% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 35%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB 8,379 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 107GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 75 Write 32.1 Mixed 43.3 57% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.24 78% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 12GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 21 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.8 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 20.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 53.8 74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	357x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16