Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '18 at 13:16
Run Duration427 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.7% Good
SC Int 74.1
SC Float 75.2
SC Mixed 73.1
59% 74.1 Pts
QC Int 296
QC Float 297
QC Mixed 295
67% 296 Pts
MC Int 1,083
MC Float 1,124
MC Mixed 1,126
166% 1,111 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 77.4
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 102
27% 80.5 fps
MRender 73.2
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 50.7
31% 71.1 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$300
630GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 468
Write 388
Mixed 171
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 17.5
69% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 73.4
DQ Mixed 46.2
48% 79.6 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 135%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
238GB free
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 481
Write 264
Mixed 238
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 5.83
66% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 6.09
43% 100 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 69%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
33GB free
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 482
Write 255
Mixed 230
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 5.79
66% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 6.06
40% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
13GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
Read 18
Write 2.64
Mixed 4.05
8% 8.22 MB/s
4K Read 3.98
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.83
91% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9965516-100.A00 9965516-100.A00 9965516-113.A00 9965516-113.A00 9965516-100.A00 9965516-100.A00 9965516-113.A00 9965516-113.A00 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
MC Read 35
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 28.6
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $871
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $74G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback