Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 76.6 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 79.9 44% 65.9 Pts	4-Core 83.9 8-Core 81.8 11% 82.9 Pts	64-Core 82.6 5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 8446) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 327.23 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Lighting 17.7 Reflection 16 Parallax 19 14% 17.6 fps	MRender 22.1 Gravity 16.3 Splatting 15.2 14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K87RA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 603 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 296 (64) Unknown 100 100 932224 (65) Unknown 100 100 138432 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 17 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 274 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1365 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 28 100 150324838428 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1690 (EA) Unknown 100 100 810 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1316 (F2) Unknown 100 100 609 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	30.9% Below average	Read 215 Write 104 Mixed 71.5 28% 130 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 19.6 4K Mixed 7.99 52% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 27.7 DQ Mixed 7.34 10% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B2873FHS-CH9 3GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5400Intel $75Bench 36%, 14,795 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	1x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	2x
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 Samsung M378B2873FHS-CH9 3GBMicronBench 15%, 13 samples	1x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B2873FHS-CH9 3GBElpidaBench 19%, 13 samples	1x
HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4GBHynixBench 29%, 22 samples	1x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $97

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16