Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '18 at 20:28
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	45%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 95.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 223 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 438 59% 440 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Lighting 76.3 Reflection 80.7 Parallax 69.9 62% 75.6 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 70.9 Splatting 76.6 60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 88GB free Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2621974 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -76373108452292 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3533 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 110 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2621974 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2621974 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2621974 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 948 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1124 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1124 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2278	51% Above average	Read 186 Write 165 Mixed 138 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 14.2 88% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 43.1 69% 132 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 66%
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11986677 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -38379827750287 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4596 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 87 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11986677 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11986677 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11986677 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10048 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11767 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11767 (F2) Unknown 0 0 26100	34.1% Below average	Read 186 Write 153 Mixed 123 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 9.44 54% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 19.1 DQ Write 47.3 DQ Mixed 9.27 14% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 66%
WD Se 4TB-$90 2,519 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 194 193 365 (03) Spinup time 156 154 11158 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3043 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1774 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1703 (10) Unknown 4 196 71038283778 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3023 (C2) HDA temperature 121 115 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 30 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 26 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 32	80.9% Excellent	Read 133 Write 149 Mixed 131 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 2.78 4K Mixed 0.22 117% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 73,650 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 19.6 62% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 19 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 54.2 74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	749x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	508x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	384x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	151x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	145x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	75x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	70x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	66x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	58x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	55x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $391

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16