Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '18 at 09:52
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 77.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 224 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 710 69% 568 Pts	64-Core 1,162 72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 115 Parallax 109 89% 111 fps	MRender 96.8 Gravity 101 Splatting 99.3 81% 99.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19689 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 440 (B1) Unknown 91 91 189 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 47 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 62 (F1) Unknown 99 99 62364279728	97.6% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 412 Mixed 416 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 38.7 139% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 89.7 97% 166 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 18093144 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2889 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 1431172 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2926 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 75 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 11 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 57 672989224 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 51 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8666 (C2) HDA temperature 40 43 64424509480 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 112425063940598 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6108385822 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1595812222	89% Excellent	Read 156 Write 155 Mixed 160 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.34 103% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 113%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136 7,908 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 130GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 88 34865819 (03) Spinup time 89 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4229 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (07) Seek error rate 49 49 23502502909442 (09) Power-on hours count 43 43 50377 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 14 (0C) Power cycle count 100 37 484 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 78 103080787994 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 6389 (BE) vendor-specific 57 39 9196265144363 (C2) HDA temperature 43 61 55834574891 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 15 10 34865819 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	46.2% Average	Read 81.7 Write 79.1 Mixed 77.7 60% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.34 82% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 59%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 119GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 99 13437192 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2222 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 28541744 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 11338 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 172 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 58 656146469 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 32 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 33052 (C2) HDA temperature 37 42 77309411365 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 61117384629497 (F1) Unknown 100 253 25586597911 (F2) Unknown 100 253 100536677144	67.3% Good	Read 111 Write 122 Mixed 139 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.45 181% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3200-MR 2x8GB 3,635 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	81.4% Excellent	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 30.3 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 21.2 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)