Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR) 11,837 User benchmarks, average bench 42% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 67.8 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 133 53% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 223 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX7000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 2,200 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: CB1.1.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 1,042 Write 515 Mixed 659 163% 739 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 11.3 75% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 73.7 DQ Mixed 11.1 19% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 126%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 1,521 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	6.72% Terrible	Read 19.4 Write 10.5 Mixed 10.6 16% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.39 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 26% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.72% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FBD2 2x4GB 3,180 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.9% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 14.4 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 9 21% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	44x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	24x

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $439

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16