Hp-pavilion GN553AAR-ABA m9040n

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion GN553AAR-ABA m9040n (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Berkeley
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071024
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '18 at 04:54
Run Duration	347 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 58 1-Core 18.2 2-Core 35.8 28% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 41.2 8-Core 52.8 6% 47 Pts	64-Core 56.5 4% 56.5 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E218) 2GB CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Lighting 27.5 Reflection 29.4 Parallax 32.8 22% 29.9 fps	MRender 26 Gravity 22 Splatting 34.7 23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40 2,673 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19470 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 77 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 87 87 411 (AE) Unknown 100 100 43 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1036 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 78 48 223339282454 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 87 87 13 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 21051256816 (F7) Unknown 100 100 704444076 (F8) Unknown 100 100 2737885834	42.5% Average	Read 197 Write 224 Mixed 152 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 14.5 63% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 57.5 DQ Mixed 17.6 20% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 104%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43 15,932 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 28GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 93929825 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6945 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 625851686 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 43747 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 375 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032867 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 35 1151522045973 (C2) HDA temperature 21 65 47244640277 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 38 93929825 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 86676735039210 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1792668749 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4254453158	41.8% Average	Read 73.3 Write 72.4 Mixed 61.9 52% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.27 72% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 58%
WD Elements 1078 2TB 2,608 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2TB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 20.5 Mixed 19.8 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.19 68% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 452GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 21.2 Mixed 22.1 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.17 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 44%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 878 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 59GB free, PID 00d2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	7.67% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 13.2 Mixed 13.5 20% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.15 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.66 43% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.67% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.54% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 1.2 7% 2.4 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 1.1 5% 1.87 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.54% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GN553AAR-ABA m9040n Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion GN553AAR-ABA m9040n

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $301

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16