HP p6-2411esm

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2411esm  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 20:33
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 81.8
46% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 194
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(1B0A 90BE) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 2.03
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
668GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 132
111% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.14
40% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback