PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P (all builds) |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20121018 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 08 '18 at 08:47 |
Run Duration | 376 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
47.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
30.3%
Below average
|
||||
34.3%
Below average
|
||||
71.2%
Very good
|
||||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.77%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 75x |
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 66x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 39x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 46x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 20x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $335 |