Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '18 at 11:11
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6402P 15,913 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 109 2-Core 218 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 413 55% 414 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 61.4 Parallax 79.6 0% 47.2 fps	MRender 75 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 45.9 50% 63.6 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LET-64M2S 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: PQD9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1888 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1131136 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2299	39.5% Below average	Read 322 Write 99.1 Mixed 155 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 13.7 60% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 72.5 DQ Write 35.9 DQ Mixed 22.1 25% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 40%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 494GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 65536 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 66 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12897026229 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 529 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1656 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 450 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 529 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 529 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 197569871907 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	78.9% Very good	Read 132 Write 144 Mixed 30.4 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.21 82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Goodram GR2133D464L15S/4G 2x4GB 484 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.3% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 22.8 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 22.1 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	245x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	145x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	127x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	116x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	106x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	39x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	33x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	34x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16