Asus P8Q77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Q77-M  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '18 at 19:32
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450S-$130
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 92
2-Core 182
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 338
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 33
30% 32 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 33.7
29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM001B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 515
Write 417
Mixed 463
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 11.8
82% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 11.7
20% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72%
Great: 104%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
12GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 486
Write 208
Mixed 294
72% 329 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 3.69
88% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 3.82
17% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 78%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
314GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 126
Write 142
Mixed 123
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 3.05
4K Mixed 0.23
102% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77%
Great: 100%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
85GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 110
Write 78.4
Mixed 108
75% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.22
78% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
5GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 87.7
Write 84.9
Mixed 86.1
65% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.27
102% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-427.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Q77-M Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Q77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback