PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110809 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 14 '18 at 17:35 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | GEO-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Zotac(19DA 1227) 1GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 540s Series 120GB
6GB free
Firmware: LSBG200 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 68x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 38x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 38x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 21x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $234 |