Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170323
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 03:15
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 224 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 413 54% 408 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 42.2 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 41.2 34% 39.4 fps	Gravity 41.2 Splatting 39.6 36% 40.4 fps
Poor: 27% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 118GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11198 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1837 (B1) Unknown 92 92 274 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 30 (EB) Unknown 99 99 518 (F1) Unknown 99 99 42824805174	98.9% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 444 Mixed 487 107% 481 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 23.6 125% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 80 127% 243 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 110%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2379 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 192 (64) Unknown 100 100 2660384 (65) Unknown 100 100 564000 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 96 96 1568 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 668 (B7) Unknown 96 96 26 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 100 180389937186 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 96 96 4 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4987 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3304 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4070 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4685 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	55.4% Above average	Read 459 Write 191 Mixed 186 61% 279 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 9.23 76% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 8.51 29% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$33 14,163 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	75% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 25 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 20.3 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	472x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	421x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	204x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $750

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16