To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '18 at 13:40
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 85.8
40% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 84.9
8-Core 84.2
11% 84.6 Pts
64-Core 85.8
5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 4.19
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 225
Write 87.6
Mixed 87.5
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 7.04
69% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 51.5
DQ Mixed 8.32
15% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 83%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
12GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 10.5
Mixed 11.6
18% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.12
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.58
70% 2.51 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback