Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '18 at 01:09
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 104
49% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 160
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 7.27
Reflection 8.23
Parallax 9.19
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 9.96
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 48
Write 35
Mixed 43.9
32% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.19
51% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
6GB free
Firmware: ST1OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 101
Mixed 102
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.42
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1.5TB
24GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 80
Mixed 89.7
110% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.25
58% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 48%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 135
Write 55.9
Mixed 63.7
94% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.16
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.91
114% 2.94 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.1% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 14.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.2
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $32
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback