Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '18 at 23:30
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 194 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 773 69% 583 Pts	64-Core 767 48% 767 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 160 Reflection 174 Parallax 166 130% 167 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 158 Splatting 113 103% 127 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 2,727 Write 1,260 Mixed 1,368 391% 1,785 MB/s	4K Read 50.3 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 24 152% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 49.9 DQ Write 98.3 DQ Mixed 24.5 33% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 236%
Seagate 600 240GB-$215 3,595 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 72GB free Firmware: C675 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 21 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3680 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1396 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 0 47248506910 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 97 97 4 (EA) Unknown 100 100 57819 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5897 (F2) Unknown 100 100 8339 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 27444	77.5% Very good	Read 511 Write 454 Mixed 476 107% 480 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 16.7 90% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 16 27% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 833GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 121663568 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 826 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5850869 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 858 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 494 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 131075 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 46 571801634 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 188 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6328 (C2) HDA temperature 34 54 60129542178 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 113859583017333 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6530935775 (F2) Unknown 100 253 6973119462	93.7% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 151 Mixed 161 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.33 92% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$137 7,627 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 36.6 MC Mixed 32 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 26 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)