Asrock Z270M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161206
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 10 '18 at 06:21
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 263
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 787
76% 628 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8427) 1GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1275 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 13.1
9% 11.7 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 14.6
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 504
Write 261
Mixed 505
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 17.9
96% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 21.2
28% 47 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 141
Mixed 139
107% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.2
88% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 136
Write 153
Mixed 133
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.46
4K Mixed 0.29
112% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 84%
I-O DATA HDCA-UT 3TB
2TB free, PID 013c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 136
Write 120
Mixed 108
152% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.28
82% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 73%
Corsair Voyager Mini 3.0 64GB
37GB free, PID 1a0c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 153
Write 17.3
Mixed 25
56% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 0.08
4K Mixed 0.07
44% 3.52 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270M Pro4 Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $514
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback