Fujitsu Celsius W420

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu Celsius W420 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3162-C1
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131015
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '18 at 08:28
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 188 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 368 49% 368 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11D7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 1.38 2% 1.66 fps	MRender 3.62 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 6 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 22405 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 538 (E8) Unknown 100 100 61123446259 (E9) Unknown 97 0 97	64.8% Good	Read 414 Write 409 Mixed 392 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 14.8 73% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 45.4 DQ Mixed 14 16% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 106%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 654GB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 64 185006511 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 122 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5286472 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 125705102819419 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 58 705888285 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 142 (C2) HDA temperature 29 42 81604378653 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -17476221927342 (F1) Unknown 100 253 918944572 (F2) Unknown 100 253 242624956 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	52% Above average	Read 97.8 Write 83.4 Mixed 68.6 62% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 0.69 130% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 61GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 135 4066 (04) Start/Stop count 83 83 17262 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28496 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 983 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 130 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17262 (C2) HDA temperature 99 93 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40.2% Average	Read 77.1 Write 62.8 Mixed 78.3 55% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.37 87% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 46GB free Firmware: FJK3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 162751552 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11937 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 177554392 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18420 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 349 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 51 723058726 (C2) HDA temperature 38 49 60129542182 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 48 30 162751552 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -99041945831643 (F1) Unknown 100 253 590304462 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1610552368	34.7% Below average	Read 78.8 Write 42.1 Mixed 68.2 48% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.35 80% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 9905471-084.A01LF 16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.2 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Celsius W420 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu Celsius W420

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	93x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	79x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $149Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	6x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $115Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	5x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,893 samples	10x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	7x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 1,445 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16