| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A68M-HD+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20160112 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 10 '18 at 23:30 |
| Run Duration | 93 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
59.1%
Above average
|
60% 100 Pts
|
32% 244 Pts
|
15% 245 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
EVGA(3842 1563) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1053 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
18% 23.2 fps
|
20% 25.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
127% 169 MB/s
|
108% 0.99 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. CL11-11-11 D3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
38.7%
Below average
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
27% 9.37 GB/s
|
46% 87.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 38x |
| Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples | 27x |
| A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 32x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 19x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $29 |