Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100503
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '18 at 18:51
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 110
55% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 328
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Asus(1043 0423) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.950.0.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
8.71% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 13.5
8% 12.3 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 9.57
Splatting 16.3
11% 12.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.71%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 306
Write 116
Mixed 145
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 10.5
96% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 11.1
24% 47 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
464GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 78.2
Mixed 27.9
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.35
85% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
19GB free
Firmware: CC3E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 86.7
Write 79.7
Mixed 36.7
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 68%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 250GB
210GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 33.1
Mixed 5.76
28% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.32
48% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback