Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '18 at 12:23
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 253
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 737
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP580 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 343
Write 250
Mixed 250
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 5.13
4K Mixed 2.03
36% 9.15 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
162GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 110
Write 91.5
Mixed 91.8
73% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.52
117% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 10.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $556
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback