Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140815
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '18 at 12:51
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 213 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 545 58% 460 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B7) ≥ 4GB; asus 1060 6gb CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	Lighting 74.2 Reflection 75.2 Parallax 64.8 60% 71.4 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 68.4 57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 63 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 30 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 61 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 706256816	46.1% Average	Read 428 Write 177 Mixed 236 61% 280 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.8 68% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 134%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 152GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2058 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 646 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 51 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 123 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2375709209	84.2% Excellent	Read 482 Write 265 Mixed 278 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 27 131% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 37.8 77% 160 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 48GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 89 43729210 (03) Spinup time 98 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 74 74 27138 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 93659100 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27818 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 86 86 14564 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 40 555679776 (C2) HDA temperature 32 60 55834574880 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 65 46 71878486 (C5) Current pending sector count 93 93 146 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 93 93 146 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 160 57 196	26.4% Poor	Read 49 Write 42.9 Mixed 45.3 34% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.36 86% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 16GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 95 67311868 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1118 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 50 782584710235 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22266 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 969 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 40 505217054 (C2) HDA temperature 30 60 51539607582 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 54 48135782 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29.4% Poor	Read 49.4 Write 52.6 Mixed 46.5 37% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.29 83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 13GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 88 231038753 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 20781 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 19 (07) Seek error rate 59 58 2457149118651 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 25265 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 86 86 14542 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 44 538902560 (C2) HDA temperature 32 56 60129542176 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 65 49 226162871 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 145 156 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 96 249 4	29.2% Poor	Read 54.3 Write 47.1 Mixed 46.9 37% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.29 73% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C7 4x4GB 782 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 16.8 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VI GENE Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE - $133

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	188x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	107x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	43x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	20x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	14x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $562

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16