| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4A88T-V EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101215 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 04 '18 at 12:56 |
| Run Duration | 209 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.9%
Good
|
52% 79.9 Pts
|
30% 237 Pts
|
18% 290 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 5000
Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83
|
12%
Very poor
|
11% 16 fps
|
14% 17.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
38.9%
Below average
|
49% 65.6 MB/s
|
103% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA01104 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
25.2%
Poor
|
26% 35.5 MB/s
|
18% 0.19 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD401LJ 400GB
22GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
31.5%
Below average
|
41% 54.1 MB/s
|
96% 0.81 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
342GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
34% 26.7 MB/s
|
70% 0.82 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.7%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
56% 71 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A88T-V EVO Builds (Compare 29 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A88T-V EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 6x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 5x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples | 4x |
| GTX 480Nvidia $500Bench 20%, 3,874 samples | 2x |
| Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $111 |