| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Asus N53Jg (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK N53Jg |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101105 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 04 '18 at 19:25 |
| Run Duration | 102 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 M 480
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
42.7%
Average
|
42% 65 Pts
|
19% 146 Pts
|
10% 167 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 415M
Asus(1043 15A2) 1GB
CLim: 500 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.66
|
1.38%
Terrible
|
1% 1.32 fps
|
1% 1.81 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD24 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
51.2%
Above average
|
59% 79.8 MB/s
|
41% 0.29 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905428-045.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.6%
Poor
|
22% 7.8 GB/s
|
16% 5.5 GB/s
|
32% 124 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N53Jg Builds (Compare 17 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus N53Jg
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples | 7x |
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 6x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 16x |
| GeForce GT 415MNvidiaBench 1%, 85 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $158 |