Asrock H87M

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87M (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130705
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '18 at 14:43
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 63.3 2-Core 98.1 52% 80.3 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 237 23% 188 Pts	64-Core 242 15% 242 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% MSI(1462 3050) 2GB CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 19 15% 17.1 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 14.1 Splatting 21.3 14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 415 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1001 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 54 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2399535782	110% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 408 Mixed 417 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 41.7 171% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 116 132% 228 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 207GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 172 2316 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3485 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 21978 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3334 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 197 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3421 (C2) HDA temperature 104 92 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	77% Very good	Read 136 Write 132 Mixed 128 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.24 4K Mixed 0.29 94% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 109%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB 3,111 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 172GB free Firmware: 21.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 190 186 5475 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8174 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 9 9 66678 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3980 (BE) vendor-specific 49 41 51 (C2) HDA temperature 99 91 51 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.3% Below average	Read 53.6 Write 51.4 Mixed 51.5 39% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.41 98% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 36%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 106GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 85 222503007 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6652 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 23 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 85163485 (09) Power-on hours count 38 38 54677 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3631 (BB) vendor-specific 59 59 41 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 58 47 707330090 (C2) HDA temperature 42 53 107374182442 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 65 50 227683585 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 20 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	51.1% Above average	Read 88.8 Write 89.2 Mixed 79.7 64% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.42 98% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.6 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 12.5 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M - $151

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	28x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	9x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	8x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	9x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
730 Series 240GBIntel $250Bench 84%, 8,417 samples	3x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	5x
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16