Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H57D-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091218
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateApr 09 '18 at 02:52
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 126
52% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 176
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Lighting 50.5
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 41.9
41% 46.3 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 43
Splatting 38.9
33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
41GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 353
Write 139
Mixed 152
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 30.3
104% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 47.8
50% 83 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 134%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
474GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 96
Write 105
Mixed 52.4
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.39
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
87GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 41.4
Mixed 23.1
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.27
69% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
623GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 29.1
Mixed 30.3
39% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback