Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '18 at 01:12
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 616
60% 491 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 36.3
32% 35.5 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 35
30% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 FDE 2.5" 256GB
175GB free
Firmware: AXM77D1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
48% Average
Read 250
Write 240
Mixed 237
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 10.6
65% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 12.8
32% 67.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48%
Great: 52%
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 489
Write 154
Mixed 217
62% 286 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 2.38
65% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 55.5
DQ Mixed 2.06
12% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 82%
Lexar JumpDrive P20 USB 3.0 32GB-$23
9GB free, PID a212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 70%
Generic USB Flash Disk 8GB
2GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 58.9
Write 6.85
Mixed 8.94
21% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.32
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.05
40% 2.56 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $337
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback